Revelation, When The Fifth Seal Is Being Open By Jesus The...

According to the Book of Revelation, when the sixth seal is being open by Jesus the Manhattan Project is already in the thought planning phase. In June 1942, God’s strategy proves the Manhattan Project is, a methodical effort run by the military [under great secrecy], and once complete will be a turning point in World War II . In other words, in John’s vision, the sixth seal is a warning to all humans that any problem of any hour is solvable, and for those who are no longer part of his Kingdom of God, will be cast out for eternity. One of the most characteristic features of the Manhattan Project is not to understand the weapons impending doom, but is a divine purpose, that if anyone who fails to understand the significance of the project’s truth will not know the full extent of God’s purpose. With the United State scientists and the military, no introduction is necessary, since it’s beginnings, the project is part of several espionage attacks from o ther countries, for the reasons they know any completion of the project will be synonymous with an end to the Antichrist’s time. Yet, the project as a great evil will damn the souls of thousands by exchanging counterfeit solutions for natural human problems that will ordinarily lead a person to God but will all be part of superstitious darkness for decades to come. While this project, interferes with each person, it does send whole populations to look for a savior, not of divine power, but to the President of the United StatesShow MoreRelatedEssay on Fall of Asclepius95354 Words   |  382 Pagesespecially me. Some people got stronger due to the outbreak. Some became weaker. Being leader of the survivors? This idea would be absurd to me before the outbreak. I never wanted to be a leader. I just wanted to get by life like any other person. I didnt believe that I would make a good leader. But I was wrong. What was that quote by Umbert...? Umberto Eco! It was, The real hero is always a hero by mistake; he dreams of being an honest coward like everyone else. How true that quote is. This war wasRead MoreExploring Corporate Strategy - Case164366 Words   |  658 Pagesof longer and shorter cases to increase the ï ¬â€šexibility for teachers. Combined with the illustrations and the short case examples at the end of each chapter (in both versions of the book) this increases the reader’s and tutor’s choice. For example, when deciding on material for Chapter 2, the case example, Global Forces and the European Brewing Industry, tests a reader’s understanding of the main issues inï ¬â€šuencing the competitive position of a number of organisations in the same industry with a relatively

Essay on Leo Africanus Book Review - 1320 Words

HIS306 Leo Africanus Book Review Leo Africanus By, Amin Maalouf In the book Leo Africanus it is a fictionalized biography of a real person, Hasan al- Wazzan. Hasan and his family were forced to flee to Fez, where he grew up and became a very well-off merchant. The book really gives a clear picture of his family life as a child, his education, his marriages, his travels, and his bitter- sweet reminiscence of exile. The narrator of Amin Maaloufs historical novel, Hasan al-Wazzan - who came to be named Leo Africanus - was born in 1488, in the weakening days of Moorish Granada. At the age of 4, Hasan and his family went into exile, like many other Muslims and Jews who declined to accept the new faith and managed to flee from†¦show more content†¦He finds a lifelong friend at school, Harun, and together they roam the streets of the city, looking for adventure. Hasan accompanies his uncle on his first tactful mission, and as their caravan roam the huge Sahara, his uncle fills in the historic gaps for young Hasan, teaching him the art of storyt elling. His tone was so reassuring, Hasan later recalls, that it made me breathe once more the odors of the Granada of my birth, and his prose was so bewitching that my camel seemed to move forwards in time with the rise and fall of its rhythms. When the uncle dies, Hasan takes command of the caravan and returns home with his first wife, while his sister Miriam is forced to the lepers quarter in Fez. At the end of the fifteenth century, however, Fez was still enjoying great commercial prosperity and was at the peak of its fame as a seat of learning, its mosques, and libraries being the resort of students from many parts of the Muslim world, it was therefore the most natural haven for the exiles from Granada. Next, his travels took him eastward across the Sahara to Egypt en route to Mecca for the Hajj, the annual Pilgrimage. On the boat trip up the Nile he met a woman who gave him the use of her house for his break in Cairo. It was there that he met and married the beautiful Nur, widow of a nephew and rival to the Ottoman caliph, Selim the Grim. â€Å"In no other city than Cairo, doesShow MoreRelatedEssay on The Moor in the Works of William Shakespeare4150 Words   |  17 Pagesliterature of the period. Moors appear not only as subject matter in writings during this time, but as authors as well. Two nooks that may have influenced peoples views of Africa were Hakluyts Principal Navigations, written in 1589, and John Leo Africanus A Geographical Historie of Africa, which was widely read in Europe in the latter half of the 1500s and translated into English by John Pory in 1600 (Bartels 435).       Hakaluyts work is characterized by descriptions of his personal

Perspectives on International Law in Turkey -myassignmenthelp

Question: Write about thePerspectives on International Law in Turkey for Rights. Answer: Introduction The International Human Rights law was established in 1948 under the Declaration of rights of human beings. These rights are used to express the right and freedoms of all human beings irrespective of their race, origin or background. This was an agreement made to uphold the nature of human beings and has been used to create treaties, bills, conventions and constitutional provisions (Human rights, 2006). The International Human Rights consist of the two Covenants on Civil, Political Rights, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the Bill of Human Beings Rights (Michael, 2014). The International Law protects human rights through International Treaties. For instance, when a country joins a treaty that is bound by the international human rights law, it must protect individual human rights, and avoid from interfering with those rights (United Nations, n.d.). Turkey is a country that is accused of human rights violations on multiple occasions especially due to the series of coups experienced. Human rights conventions have been ratified in various states but there are still many violations that are reported especially in non-western countries. In Turkey, the government had made efforts to protect and respect individual human rights. However, recently after the attempted coup in 2016, the violation of human rights has been on the rise. This essay argues about the universalism and relativity of human beings rights. Turkey In the past, Turkey was under the Ottoman Empire which underwent secession after the first world war. As a result, in 1923, a new Turkey was established. The international human rights conventions were established after the second world war. Traditionally, Turkey was a country that violated human rights especially those of detainees. This is mainly due to the coups that have affected it between 1960 and 1980. In 2002, the new government under the Justice and Development Party uphold the international law and it started by abolishing the state of emergency that had been there for twenty-five years (Human Rights and the Transformation Process in Turkey, 2013). This government made changes that were targeted towards improving the human rights laws in Turkey. In 2010, the constitution was amended and it included more rights and the restructuring of the judicial system. In 2013, it established a legal framework that allowed more freedom of speech based on the penal code of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) (Buckley, 2001). In addition, the prisons were inspected by the human rights inquiry committee which shared the findings with non- governmental organizations. Similarly, there have been efforts made to protect womens right regarding violence and abuse. Indeed, Turkey was the first country to sign the document on the convention in Istanbul concerning violence against women. additionally, there was more awareness on human rights with the issue being added to the primary school curriculum, high school electives, and professional training programs. Lastly, people with different religious beliefs were allowed to practice their religions and have different schools based on these beliefs (Human Rights and the Transformation Process in Turkey, 2013). In July 2016, there was a failed coup aimed against President Erdo?an and the Justice and Development Party in Turkey. The coup left more than 200 people dead and approximately 2000 injured. The events that led to the coup were clashes between the Kurdistan Workers Party and the government that left civil servant such as mayors jobless or detained. The government also blocked non-governmental organizations such as Amnesty International and the United Nation from documenting human rights violations in the southeast region of the country (Amnesty International, 2017). It is worth noting that the Kurdistans Workers Party is defined as a terrorist group by the United States, the European Union and the Turkish government (Miles, 2017). In addition, the parliament had approved a law that gave the president executive powers. After the failed coup, the government announced a state of emergency which was later extended in October. Over the following months, there have been cases of human rights abuses of the detainees and civil servants. The country deviated from the two human rights conventions aforementioned but it is prohibited from deviating from the core rights that protect the rights of detainees (Human Rights Watch, 2017). The Turkish government has succeeded in denying the freedom of expression in the country by attacking journalists through prosecution, jailing and closing down of media outlets. Moreover, it has taken over media companies through appointing government trustees such as the Zaman Newspaper. Major government critics were also arrested and twitter accounts suspended at the request of the government. Civil servants such as teachers, and judges were suspended without investigation and non-governmental organizations shut down. In addition, trustees were appointed to replace elected offic ials. Perspectives of human rights in Turkey and the West Human beings rights are universal which means they are the same irrespective of the country where they are practiced. Universalism is the view that rights are similar in every country. Rights are either right or wrong depending on their nature not on their cultural setting. However, these rights can be applied differently depending on the cultural settings (Ellis, Emon, Glahn, 2012). In addition, this means that though a right depends on the culture of the people, its the nature of the right that determines its application. This view of human rights has been opposed because it is seen as a way for the Western states to dominate other states. This is mainly because human rights were developed by western states and seem to favor their interests. In a broader concept, this way of thinking is referred to as liberalism. Liberalists believe that human beings have basic rights that should be protected and respected (Marianne Tim, 2008). This is widely practiced by the Western states since 1945 before the human rights international law was established. On the other hand, in relativism, human rights are not dependent on culture but are as a result of those cultures. This means that there are no universal human rights and it is wrong for international institutions to impose such laws on sovereign states ("Human Rights", 2014). Additionally, some states accept that there are universal human rights but they reject the perspective of the Western states regarding human rights. According to these states, human rights development should be based on the religious beliefs and cultural values of various communities in the world (Ellis, Emon, Glahn, 2012). In a broader concept, this viewpoint is regarded as realism. According to realist, human rights are just a propaganda that should only be pursued if it is in the best interest of the country otherwise they should not be considered (Marianne Tim, 2008). In fact, these states regard human rights as a tool used by powerful states such as the United States to exercise their power and benefit. For example, when the United States wants to overthrow a regime it may use the international law on human rights for this purpose (Jones, 2013). The Refah Partisi and Others v. Turkey case were judged by the Grand Chamber of the ECHR in 2003. The case involved Refah Partisi a political party that was formed in 1983 (Case of Refah Partisi and Others V. Turkey, 2003). In 1995, the party was the most popular due to the majority of seats it obtained in the general election and had formed a coalition government. Prior to the Grand Chambers decision, the party had been dissolved by the Turkish constitutional court. The party was dissolved based on the following allegations that showed the party did not support secularism as required by the Turkish constitution. First, the party leaders advocated for the abolishment of secularism in public. Second, they openly supported the wearing of headscarves by women in public institutions which was against secularism. Third, some of the members openly supported the implementation of the Islamic law through bloodshed. Four, the members appealed to Islamic leaders to offer their support to the party and some hosted these leaders in meetings ("Refah Partisi and Others v. Turkey Article 19", 2003). Meanwhile, the party did not take any disciplinary measures on any of these members showing that their views reflected the views of the party. The party brought the case before the court due to the abuse of their freedom of expression and association. However, the principal state counsel that had filed the case for its dissolution argued that the party supported had expressed its opinion regarding plurality where the legal systems are different for various groups based on their religious beliefs such as sharia law. Therefore, these meant that the partys objectives were not in alignment with those of the state and the constitution did allow such a party to be dissolved. The Grand Chamber ruled that the party should be dissolved. This is because sharia laws were incompatible with the democratic laws. Refah had argued that it supported pluralism because it gave courts jurisdiction on cases that dealt with religious beliefs. The court agreed that political parties are a form of freedom of association in a democratic society. This means that the dissolution of the party was indeed a violation of the freedom of association. However, the European Convention mainly upheld the laws of a democratic society and not laws based on religious beliefs ("Refah Partisi and Others v. Turkey Article 19", 2003). The court also recognized that pluralism is a form of democracy. This supports the freedom of expression of political parties. For this case, there was a violation of the freedom of expression of Refah. Secularism was considered one of the principles that the state is governed by. A violation of this principle threatened the democracy of the state thus the dec ision to dissolve the party was upheld. This case revealed the different views on human rights. For members of Refah, freedom of expression involved the expression of their religious beliefs and their relation to the law. According to them, the international law should be in agreement with the sharia law. Meanwhile, the international community feels that the sharia law is a threat to the universal human rights. This means that for one law to exist the other must be abolished. This restrictive nature of the international laws enforces the belief that these laws do not consider the cultural and religious beliefs of a community hence relativism (Ellis, Emon, Glahn, 2012). Nevertheless, in a world where Islam is the fastest growing religion shouldnt it be wiser to find common ground between international law and Islamic law? Another similar case had been brought before the same court in 1998 namely, United Communists Party and others v. Turkey ("Case of the united communist party of Turkey and others v. Turkey", 2007). The party had been formed in 1990. In the same year, the Principal of state wanted it dissolved based on the allegation that it threatened the unity of the citizens. Another reason is that the word communist had been used in naming the party. Lastly, it was seen as a replacement of the Kurdish Workers Party which had been dissolved. In its program, the party had stated that it would fight for the rights of the Kurdish through the political arena but not through violence as is advocated by the international community. The party advocated for the unity of Kurds and Turks to restore peace. Despite this, the party was dissolved in 1991("Case Law of The European Court of Human Rights Related to Public International Law", 2016). In the trial, the government argued that the name communist undermined the constitution. According to the name, the party would advocate a communism which was against the constitutions law on pluralism. The partys agenda to free the Kurdish people also undermined the constitution and unity of the people. According to the constitution, the Turkish citizenship did not recognize such identities. The Kurdish were allowed to identify themselves by that title but they were not allowed to form minority groups. The applicants complained that dissolving the party was a violation of their freedom to assemble and associate. The court ruled that political parties are an essential part of a democratic state. The court emphasized that political parties were included in the article regarding the association. In addition, it stated that the government was allowed to act in any way when it felt that a party threatened the state but it had to do within the guidelines of the convention. It ruled that based on the partys agenda, there was no evidence that showed the party intended to use violence to violate the rights of other people or push its agenda. There was no evidence to show that the party was not supporting democracy. In fact, the party had outlined in its constitutions that one of its methods to resolve conflict was to use dialogue which is democratic. Additionally, the partys name could not prove without any doubts the party was a threat to the nations security ("United Communist Party of Turkey v. Turkey", 2008). The chairman and the vice chairman had also asked to be compensated for the damages incurred in legal fees due to the dissolution. They also claimed their rights to associate and express themselves had been violated. This is because once the party was dissolved they were also banned from holding public offices such as members of parliament. The court ruled that dissolving the party had interfered with the rights of its chairman and vice chairman regarding their association. As a result, the government was supposed to compensate them the total sum of the legal fees incurred ("United Communist Party of Turkey v. Turkey", 2008). Based on this case, it is evident that the Turkish government is violated the laws in the convention when dissolving this party. It is universal that in a democratic society political parties are a must and they represent different political views of the citizens. Despite this, the government was against the idea of a political party that expressed the views of the Kurdish people. This reveals the governments relativism in dealing with the political rights of its citizens. Evidently, when the situation presented itself the government chose to defy the international law and impose its own rules. Conclusion The constitution of the country allows the derogation of the laws in the state of emergency but it must not be against the international laws. Additionally, it states some laws that are not supposed to be suspended. For example, everyone has a right to their own life, and they have a right to remain innocent until they are proven guilty in a court through a fair trial ("The Turkish State of Emergency Under Turkish Constitutional Law and International Human Rights Law ", 2017). Similarly, the international law provides suspensions depending on the extremity of the situation. There are also no suspensions in cases such as regarding a persons life, freedom from torture, and religion. As aforementioned, the Turkish government is currently violating these rights. This shows the governments relativism regarding these laws. Based on the first legal judgment, the universal perspective is widely accepted by the international community especially the western states. In this case, the court ruled that there was an incompatibility in the Islamic and international law which threatened the democracy of the country. Generally, in Turkey, the law concerning these rights is adhered to only when it suits the national interest thus relativism. In conclusion, both should be considered in the implementation of human beings rights especially in Turkey where they seem to be enforced only if they are in the best interest of the nation. References Amnesty International. (2017).Turkey 2016/2017. Retrieved 10 October 2017. Buckley, M. (2001). The European Convention on Human Rights and The Right to Life in Turkey.Human Rights Law Review, 36-60. The case of the united communist party of Turkey and others v. Turkey. (2007).The International Journal of Human Rights,2(2), 78-79. Ellis, D., Emon, J., Glahn, G. (2012).Islamic Law and International Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press. Human Rights and the Transformation Process in Turkey. (2013). Retrieved from https://wp-content/uploads/SAM_Papers.pdf Human Rights Watch. (2017).Turkey.Human Rights Watch. Retrieved 10 October 2017, from https://world-report/2017/country-chapters/turkey Human rights. (2006) (p. 10). New York. Human Rights. (2014). Retrieved 11 October 2017, from https://entries/rights-human/ Jones, R. (2013).Islam and English Law. Cambridge University Press. Marianne, H., Tim, D. (2008).Human rights in international relations. Retrieved from HTTP:/ //politics/research/readingroom/Dunne-Goodhart-chap04.pdf Michael, H. (2014).International Human Rights. Abingdon: Routledge. Miles, T. (2017).U.N. documents human rights violations in southeast Turkey. Retrieved 10 October 2017. Refah Partisi and Others v. Turkey Article 19. (2003). Retrieved 11 October 2017, from https://resources.php/resource/2627/en/refah-partisi-and-others-v.-turkey The Case Laws of The European Court of Human Rights Related to Public International Law. (2016). Retrieved 11 October 2017, from https://rm.coe.int/pil-2017-case-law-rev-en-case-law-echr/ The case of Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) And Others V. Turkey. (2003). Retrieved from https://wp-content/uploads/old-site-downloads/download-Refah-Partisi-v.-Turkey.pdf The Turkish State of Emergency Under Turkish Constitutional Law and International Human Rights Law (2017).America Society of International Law. Retrieved 15 October 2017, from https:// insights/volume/21/issue/1/turkish-state-emergency-under-Turkish-constitutional-law-and United Communist Party of Turkey v. Turkey. (2008). Retrieved 15 October 2017, from https://resources.php/resource/3122/en/echr:-united-communist-party-of-turkey-v.-turkey United Nations.The Foundation of International Human Rights Law. Retrieved 10 October 2017.

What are Niccolo Machiavelli’s ideas on effective leadership Sample Essay Example For Students

What are Niccolo Machiavelli’s ideas on effective leadership Sample Essay Machiavelli’s â€Å"The Prince† is a extremely alone manuscript that outlines Machiavelli’s positions on effectual leading. This piece was meant to function as a usher for what characteristics the ideal prince should possess. Machiavelli neer stated who the really â€Å"Prince† is but instead gives advice and illustrations on how person would go the perfect swayer. The Prince was written in the early 1500s where â€Å"Popes were taking ground forcess. and affluent city states of Italy were falling one after another into the custodies of foreign power† ( Wikipedia ) . It was a clip of switching confederations. political relations. and the outlook of a larger ground forces size would compare to a stronger state. We can detect with the drastic lives they lived. Machiavelli was partially influenced by his life style. As an single Machiavelli was of course misanthropic about the human race and that deeply influenced his work. We will write a custom essay on What are Niccolo Machiavelli’s ideas on effective leadership Sample specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Machiavelli’s chief thoughts on effectual leading were:1 ) A prince should prefer being feared instead than being loved. Machiavelli suggests it is â€Å"much safer to be feared than loved† ( The Prince. 3 ) . When you strike fear in your minions so they will go more intimidated. He mentions that work forces are so easy manipulated that a adept prince can command them at will. â€Å"Men. that they are thankless. fickle. false. cowardly. envious. and every bit long as you win they are yours wholly ; they will offer you their blood. belongings. life and children† ( The Prince. 4 ) . A prince that regulations on love instead than fear wouldn’t win in the existent universe because they are governing on promises and friendly relationships. Promises and friendly relationships can easy be broken but striking fright is normally lasting for an effectual Prince. 2 ) A Prince should hold mean and broad qualities. In chapter XVI Machiavelli implies that a prince should possess both a rough attitude and a mentality for autonomy. A prince should merely let freedom to those who earned it. A prince can take his ground forcess into conflict plundering and leveling everything in sight while passing down points that belong to others to the work forces of his ain. â€Å"this autonomy is necessary. otherwise he would non be followed by his soldiers† ( The Prince. 2 ) . Machiavelli entails a prince should be defensive of his land and ground forcess ; to avoid being hated and despised. A swayer that grants autonomies without being harsh will take to the ruin of the Prince. â€Å"Therefore it is wiser to hold a repute for beastliness which brings reproach without hatred. than to be compelled through seeking a repute for liberality† ( The Prince. 2 ) . 3 ) Keeping and keeping religion. A prince can ever separate the work forces who do non move in good religion ; therefore a wise prince is non bound to maintain religion with them. However. it is best for a prince to possess the â€Å"qualities of clemency. religion. unity. humanity and faith. † ( e. g. : the terminals justify the agencies ) . A prince must avoid the hate of his topics by maintaining them good armed and happy. by forbearing â€Å"to be a lawbreaker of the belongings and adult females of his subjects† ( The Prince. 9 ) . This manner a prince can change over possible enemies into followings and maintain his bing ground forcess faithful. Exemplifying similarities between Machiavelli’s point of view and modern twenty-four hours concerns isn’t hard. A corporation has male monarchs and Queenss. princes and princesses. its Lords and embassadors and their several ground forcess. A corporation besides has its enemies and its friends. It is besides noted that Machiavelli’s guidelines besides apply to amalgamations and acquisitions ( Oldham ) . When comparing Machiavelli toward modern concern patterns we see many defects. Is it acceptable for a company to perpetrate perfidy and fraud as a tolerable maneuver to acquire in front? Obviously non. Machiavelli mentality has non seen how the universe would turn out. Our universe has evolved so rapidly that even Machiavelli couldn’t predict the hereafter. .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071 , .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071 .postImageUrl , .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071 , .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071:hover , .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071:visited , .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071:active { border:0!important; } .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071:active , .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071 .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u10ae6559d5b4c3de899d8321c698d071:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Hinduism Analysis EssayIts true that a director needs to intermix a combination of fright and love to efficaciously take his/her subsidiaries. Realistically. which foreman do you love the most? The foreman who often threatened to fire you? Or the foreman who treated you with regard and listened to what you have to state? Not a tough inquiry. In today’s environment where work topographic point equality is going a mainstream issue directors have to surely â€Å"love† all their employees. However it’s true that employees may take advantage of their sort hearted personality which is why they must hold some degree of grade in â€Å"fear† . Directors must utilize their power when appropriate. It’s reasonably hard to happen a balance between the two in my sentiment. about impossible. In my sentiment. Machiavelli’s theory of â€Å"fear† over â€Å"love† is flawed in the sense that it won’t work in today’s environment. directors need to equilibrate their fear-based methods and encompass new ways of edifice love into the company’s organisational civilization. Directors and corporate leaders need to be broad in the manner where they can efficaciously authorise their employees to do their ain determinations. Leadership has alteration indefinitely where it is no longer a traditional hierarchy. A leader must larn how to train his/her employees where appropriate but non be selfish with their power and authorization. A leader taking in inhuman treatment will ensue in a high turnover rate and will take to the ruin of the concern. Trust is frequently an of import issue in concern. The trust between concerns and clients is the definition of net incomes and gross. Without trust a company would neer do it off the land. Therefore leaders of big transnational corporations need to be honest from the beginning. It is apparent that Machiavelli and the modern concern age have something they agree upon. Keeping and keeping religion. Constructing a strong trust icon can frequently take your company into positive public feedback. With that positive feedback comes more growing. more employees and in the terminal more clients. ( The terminals justify the agencies ) In decision. Machiavelli was able to sketch what a perfect leader would look like. by separating the needed traits a leader needed to hold. A leader needed to be feared. cruel at the same clip they need to maintain religion. Realistically Machiavelli’s the â€Å"perfect prince† is unachievable in the modern concern age. Machiavelli was a realist. he saw his universe for how it was ran. and non how it would hold been if it was perfect. He designed the prince to suit into this blemished universe. At that clip his prince would hold succeeded because it was a clip of frequent war. Today his prince would neglect. for now we are a universe governed by Torahs and non war. WORKS CITED Machiavelli. Niccolo. Part 1: Ancient to Pre-Industrial The PrinceProject Gutenberg. 08 March. 2008Oldham. Ronnie Machiavelli’s The Prince: A modern executive 16 Sept. 200009 March. 2008. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. pillowrock. com/ronnie/machiavelli. htmWikipedia. Online. 2006. Wikipedia. the free encyclopaedia. 08 March. 2008http: //en. wikipedia. org